Proceedings 2019Proceedings 2019
Menu

AIOC 2019, Indore

  • Home
  • Instruction Courses
  • Free Papers
  • E-Posters
  • Film Festival
  • Physical Posters
  • Poster Podium Presentations
  • Invited Sessions
  • Hyde Park
  • Pre-Conference Sessions
  • Communication

FP1456 : Comparative efficacy of alcaftadine 0.25% vs olopatadine 0.2% in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Physical Posters
  4. /
  5. Comprehensive Ophthalmology
  6. /
  7. FP1456 : Comparative efficacy...

FP1456 : Comparative efficacy of alcaftadine 0.25% vs olopatadine 0.2% in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis

Share this post

Dr.JAYARAM MEHER, M21571

Aim-To study comparative efficacy of alcaftadine 0.25% vs olopatadine 0.2% in SAC. Methods: prospective study involving 128 patients diagnosed with SAC assigned into 2 groups. 1st group received olopatadine ,2nd group alcaftadine in 1 eye & placebo drop in c/l eye used twice daily. Full ophthalmological examination done. Review on 3rd, 7th &15th day after T/t initiation. Signs &symptoms evaluated using a 3-point scale. Results:On day 3, ocular symptoms improved in alcaftadine group. F.b sensation, papillary reaction not subsided in olopatadine group. At day 3 70% cases improved, at day 7 all features subsided in alcaftadine group, but in olopatadine group f.b sensation and papillary reaction remained in 12%. At day 15, all features improved in all pts in both groups. Eyes with placebo t/t didn’t show significant improvement at day 3,7,15. Conclusion: Alcaftadine appears to be better than olopatadine 0.2% in improving ocular symptoms at 7 day followup.

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Read next article ...

FP21 : Evaluation of Barrett’s Universal II Formula in Indian Eyes.

Read previous article ...

FP1526-Vitreo Retinal Diseases - IV -Determination and validation of retinal arteriolar and venular calibre measurements using cSLO-HRA.
Close